Head-to-head · B2B data

ContactOut vs Crustdata

ContactOut wins 6 of 11 decided metrics across 1 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

ContactOut
6
Contact data for recruiting and sales: browser extension, search / enrichment and API, personal and work emails.
★ 4.5 · 128 reviewsB (strong, 4.2 to 4.5)
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations
Crustdata live
5
Unified B2B data API for company, people, jobs, web and social data, with email and phone enrichment as paid add-ons; built for agents, official CLI.
★ 4.4 · 15 reviewsB (strong, 4.2 to 4.5)
Access: MCP · CLI · API · Dataset · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric ContactOut · #14 of 29 Crustdata · not measured
Match rate69.4%-
Valid email rate64.7%-
Latency p501,024ms-
Cost / valid email--
Invalid rate11.8%-
Catch-all share20.6%-
Business email100.0%-
Right-person rate94.1%-
Decoy hit rate0.0%-
Catch-all detection71.4%-
Confidence-score quality+63.5 pts-
Geographic coverage9-
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric ContactOut · #9 of 24 Crustdata · not measured
Match rate85.7%-
Valid / reachable rate73.8%-
Latency p50490ms-
Cost / mobile number--
Right-person rate88.5%-
Mobile coverage55.1%-
Disconnected rate7.1%-
Low-activity share19.0%-
Landline / mobile classification--
Country accuracy83.3%-
Geographic coverage9-
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric ContactOut · #11 of 24 Crustdata · #9 of 24
Profile match rate91.8%95.9%
Identity accuracy97.8%97.9%
Latency p50898ms1,046ms
Price / matched profile--
Current employer accuracy97.8%91.5%
Move detection75.0%85.0%
Decoy hit rate0.0%0.0%
Job title accuracy86.7%87.2%
Seniority label accuracy81.6%80.4%
Location accuracy95.6%87.2%
Work history completeness8.27.5
Education completeness100.0%100.0%
Skills present91.1%0.0%
Social / profile URLs100.0%100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority80.0%83.3%
Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric ContactOut · #11 of 23 Crustdata · not measured
Domain-to-company match rate97.0%-
Company name accuracy95.9%-
Latency p50707ms-
Price / matched company--
Industry accuracy77.3%-
Employee count ±20%26.0%-
HQ / location accuracy93.8%-
Description present96.9%-
Founding year accuracy69.1%-
Domains / social profiles100.0%-
Coverage by country / size90.0%-
Jobs Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric ContactOut · not in suite Crustdata · #6 of 6
Employer coverage-83.3%
Postings recall-47.6%
Latency p50-2,858ms
Cost / job--
Closed or unknown postings-35.4%
Duplicate postings-13.8%
Location accuracy-96.6%
Posted-date accuracy-66.8%
Description present-100.0%
Coverage by country-81.3%
Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric ContactOut · #7 of 10 Crustdata · not measured
Coverage85.0%-
Detection accuracy35.5%-
Latency p50707ms-
Cost / lookup--
Live stack recall37.1%-
Technologies per domain80-
Dated results0.0%-
Coverage by geo / size70.0%-

Questions about ContactOut vs Crustdata

Which is better, ContactOut or Crustdata?

ContactOut wins 6 of the 11 metrics decided between them, across 1 benchmark that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: People Data: ContactOut #11 of 24, Crustdata #9 of 24.

How do ContactOut and Crustdata compare in user reviews?

ContactOut holds 4.5 / 5 across 128 reviews on G2 and Capterra; Crustdata holds 4.4 / 5 across 15 reviews on Product Hunt. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of ContactOut and Crustdata?

ContactOut offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; Crustdata offers an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, dataset delivery, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations.

Compare ContactOut with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.