Head-to-head · B2B data

Diffbot vs Prospeo

Prospeo wins 15 of 24 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Diffbot
9
Web-scale Knowledge Graph built by crawling the public web: Enhance matches people and organizations, DQL searches entities including job posts, with an optional re-crawl of sources.
★ 4.9 · 29 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: MCP · CLI · API · Dataset · CSV · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations
Prospeo
15
Contact data, email verification and enrichment for outbound via API, bulk endpoints and MCP.
★ 4.7 · 1,000 reviewsA (excellent, 4.6 or above)
Access: MCP · API · CSV · Batch · Integrations
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Diffbot · not in suite Prospeo · #23 of 29
Match rate-61.7%
Valid email rate-54.1%
Latency p50-1,231ms
Cost / valid email-$0.037
Invalid rate-2.7%
Catch-all share-40.5%
Business email-100.0%
Right-person rate-100.0%
Decoy hit rate-0.0%
Catch-all detection-60.0%
Confidence-score quality--
Geographic coverage-5
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Diffbot · not in suite Prospeo · #11 of 24
Match rate-71.4%
Valid / reachable rate-85.7%
Latency p50-570ms
Cost / mobile number-$0.231
Right-person rate-88.0%
Mobile coverage-61.2%
Disconnected rate-2.9%
Low-activity share-11.4%
Landline / mobile classification-97.1%
Country accuracy-88.6%
Geographic coverage-8
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Diffbot · #14 of 24 Prospeo · #3 of 24
Profile match rate85.0%98.0%
Identity accuracy100.0%100.0%
Latency p507,232ms1,278ms
Price / matched profile$0.022$0.020
Current employer accuracy68.6%81.3%
Move detection25.0%7.7%
Decoy hit rate20.0%0.0%
Job title accuracy49.0%56.3%
Seniority label accuracy-65.1%
Location accuracy86.3%95.8%
Work history completeness6.26.3
Education completeness90.2%0.0%
Skills present72.5%0.0%
Social / profile URLs94.1%100.0%
Coverage by geo / function / seniority60.0%83.3%
Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Diffbot · #10 of 23 Prospeo · #9 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate99.0%100.0%
Company name accuracy94.9%94.0%
Latency p501,127ms1,050ms
Price / matched company$0.022$0.020
Industry accuracy83.8%78.0%
Employee count ±20%69.9%25.7%
HQ / location accuracy82.8%81.0%
Description present100.0%94.0%
Founding year accuracy73.7%58.0%
Domains / social profiles94.9%100.0%
Coverage by country / size95.0%100.0%
Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Diffbot · not measured Prospeo · #4 of 10
Coverage-94.0%
Detection accuracy-79.5%
Latency p50-1,050ms
Cost / lookup-$0.021
Live stack recall-59.9%
Technologies per domain-26
Dated results-0.0%
Coverage by geo / size-90.0%

Questions about Diffbot vs Prospeo

Which is better, Diffbot or Prospeo?

Prospeo wins 15 of the 24 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: People Data: Diffbot #14 of 24, Prospeo #3 of 24; Company Data: Diffbot #10 of 23, Prospeo #9 of 23.

Which is cheaper, Diffbot or Prospeo?

Measured on the list price of each provider's central self-serve pack, divided by what it actually returned: People Data, price per matched profile: Diffbot $0.022, Prospeo $0.020; Company Data, price per matched company: Diffbot $0.022, Prospeo $0.020.

How do Diffbot and Prospeo compare in user reviews?

Diffbot holds 4.9 / 5 across 29 reviews on G2; Prospeo holds 4.7 / 5 across 1,000 reviews on G2 and Capterra. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Diffbot and Prospeo?

Diffbot offers an MCP server, a command-line tool, an API, dataset delivery, CSV export, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations; Prospeo offers an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API, CSV export, batch endpoints and native integrations.

Compare Diffbot with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.