Head-to-head · B2B data

Fiber AI vs Surfe

Surfe wins 8 of 12 decided metrics across 2 shared suites; the loser still leads where its column is highlighted. Same frozen test sets, same run; the better value in each row is highlighted.

Fiber AI live
4
B2B search and enrichment API with waterfall contact reveal, job-posting search and live LinkedIn profile and company fetch, over REST, official SDKs and MCP.
No public reviews
Access: MCP · API · Dataset · CSV · Batch · Webhooks
Surfe
8
Sales intelligence platform cascading emails and mobiles across 15+ providers, with people and company search, CRM sync, REST API and a native MCP server.
★ 4.4 · 69 reviewsB (strong, 4.2 to 4.5)
Access: MCP · API · Batch · Webhooks · Integrations
Email Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Fiber AI · #16 of 29 Surfe · #1 of 29
Match rate77.6%90.0%
Valid email rate63.2%66.7%
Latency p5017,360ms-
Cost / valid email$0.057-
Invalid rate2.6%1.9%
Catch-all share31.6%29.6%
Business email100.0%100.0%
Right-person rate97.4%98.1%
Decoy hit rate0.0%-
Catch-all detection--
Confidence-score quality--
Geographic coverage810
Phone Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Fiber AI · #18 of 24 Surfe · not measured
Match rate46.9%-
Valid / reachable rate78.3%-
Latency p504,967ms-
Cost / mobile number$0.069-
Right-person rate73.7%-
Mobile coverage36.7%-
Disconnected rate0.0%-
Low-activity share21.7%-
Landline / mobile classification100.0%-
Country accuracy91.3%-
Geographic coverage5-
People Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Fiber AI · #10 of 24 Surfe · not measured
Profile match rate95.9%-
Identity accuracy97.9%-
Latency p501,136ms-
Price / matched profile$0.036-
Current employer accuracy89.4%-
Move detection94.2%-
Decoy hit rate0.0%-
Job title accuracy78.7%-
Seniority label accuracy20.5%-
Location accuracy95.7%-
Work history completeness7.8-
Education completeness100.0%-
Skills present57.4%-
Social / profile URLs100.0%-
Coverage by geo / function / seniority83.3%-
Company Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Fiber AI · #7 of 23 Surfe · #6 of 23
Domain-to-company match rate100.0%100.0%
Company name accuracy95.0%96.0%
Latency p501,131ms-
Price / matched company$0.036-
Industry accuracy77.0%47.0%
Employee count ±20%27.0%18.9%
HQ / location accuracy85.0%66.0%
Description present97.0%100.0%
Founding year accuracy69.0%17.0%
Domains / social profiles100.0%100.0%
Coverage by country / size100.0%100.0%
Live Profile Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-26
Metric Fiber AI · #3 of 5 Surfe · not in suite
Current-job accuracy93.1%-
Fetch success98.0%-
Latency p505,381ms-
Cost / profile$0.037-
Move detection94.2%-
Still at previous employer4.8%-
Control accuracy91.8%-
Work history completeness8.6-
Education completeness99.0%-
Technographic Datacore + suite-specific metrics
updated 2026-09-25
Metric Fiber AI · #10 of 10 Surfe · not in suite
Coverage83.0%-
Detection accuracy18.0%-
Latency p501,131ms-
Cost / lookup$0.043-
Live stack recall6.6%-
Technologies per domain3-
Dated results0.0%-
Coverage by geo / size65.0%-

Questions about Fiber AI vs Surfe

Which is better, Fiber AI or Surfe?

Surfe wins 8 of the 12 metrics decided between them, across 2 benchmarks that measured both. Leaderboard ranks: Email Data: Fiber AI #16 of 29, Surfe #1 of 29; Company Data: Fiber AI #7 of 23, Surfe #6 of 23.

How do Fiber AI and Surfe compare in user reviews?

Fiber AI has no public reviews on G2, Capterra, TrustRadius or Trustpilot; Surfe holds 4.4 / 5 across 69 reviews on Chrome Web Store, Product Hunt and Trustpilot. Ratings belong to their platforms and play no part in the benchmark grades.

How can you get data out of Fiber AI and Surfe?

Fiber AI offers an MCP server, an API, dataset delivery, CSV export, batch endpoints and webhooks; Surfe offers an MCP server, an API, batch endpoints, webhooks and native integrations. Both offer an MCP server, an API, batch endpoints and webhooks.

Compare Fiber AI with another provider

Suggest a data provider

Not automatic, on purpose: a human has to get access (or request it when there's no self-serve), plug in an API key, adapt the frozen test files to the provider's schema, then run the suites. Leave the details below and we'll take it from there, usually within a few weeks.